EyeQuant vs Hotjar (Contentsquare)
These two don't answer the same question. Hotjar (Contentsquare) records what real visitors did — it needs a script on a live site and traffic before it can say anything. EyeQuant predicts where the eye will go — it works on a URL or a mockup, before launch, with nothing installed. Many teams run one of each: predict before, verify after.
| CRITERION | EyeQuant | Hotjar (Contentsquare) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Predictive AI heatmaps | Real-user analytics |
| Works before launch | Yes | — |
| Needs a script on your site | No | Yes |
| Session replay | — | Yes |
| Free plan | None — demo request | Free tier with generous session limits |
| Entry price | Quote-based · reported ~$499/mo | From ~$49/mo (split into 3 products since 07/2025) |
| Worth knowing | The 2009 pioneer, sales-led, enterprise positioning | Absorbed into Contentsquare in July 2025; replay + funnels + surveys at volume |
Whichever you pick — check the page BEFORE it ships.
Predictive attention works with zero script, zero traffic: score any URL /100 in 30 seconds, free.
Score my page →